‘Star Trek: Discovery’ Season 1 Review

Star Trek: Discovery is CBS’s attempt to return the beloved science fiction franchise via their All Access online streaming service. Now, I know this review is a season behind, but that is only because I have a few spoilers ahead.

The first season takes place immediately before, during, and the tail end of Starfleet’s war with the Klingon race. It follows science officer, later specialist, Michael Burnham (Sonequa Martin-Green), who commits mutiny to prevent a war with the Klingons, only for her captain to be murdered and she is thrown in jail. She is picked up by the Discovery and recruited by Captain Gabriel Lorca (Jason Isaacs) to assist with developing a new engine that uses a network of space bacteria to travel faster than warp speed.

On its face, the series has a lot of issues. Burnham’s character is an enigma. Apparently, she was raised on Vulcan by Sarek, the father of Spock, after her own parents were killed by Klingons. This character is never referenced and the only sibling Spock has ever had is a fellow Vulcan. While her character is compelling and her story interesting, I found this bizarre. It felt forced and pushed on the viewer to make you like her. It was unnecessary. Martin-Green portrayed the character well enough where the casual viewer or the fan could have made that connection with her, but knowing the history makes it difficult for me as a longtime Trekker.

Another curious thing about the show is it tried too hard to “modernize” the aesthetics despite being a prequel to The Original Series. While the Discovery is incredibly well-designed, the Starfleet uniforms, the make-up design for the Klingons, and the designs for the Mirror Verse look like they belong in a series that takes place after Star Trek: The Next Generation. Ironically, looking too futuristic for the time period of the show is supposed to take place in.

The show was also politically correct. Math, science, and naturalism reign supreme on this show. While I do not think it was more PC than DS9, it did have some moments where you wanted to roll your eyes at the pandering they do for the woke crowd. Star Trek was always smart, so to see this pandering was annoying and, yes, the show leaned Left in politics, the scripts were well-written. This was not. Officers

The finale is underwhelming. While the Klingons have almost won the war, Starfleet considers destroying their homeworld, Kronos, to deal a decisive blow, ultimately changing their minds to holding the planet hostage in order to get an armistice. I felt let down by this ending. Even DS9 had a better ending to the Dominion War.

The worst aspect is the show is its dark nature. They are using that streaming to its fullest with disturbing images of torture, strong foul language, and overt sexual themes that cross the line on network TV. It seemed the smart writing I mentioned earlier was replaced by this shock value and that is very disappointing.

That being said, the series had minor positives aspects. The entire cast is descent. It featured Isaacs, Martin-Green, also stars Doug Jones, Shazad Latif, Anthony Rapp, James Frain, Mary Wiseman, Michelle Yeoh, and Wilson Cruz. At times, the banter and cohesion as a crew on an experimental ship was well written. Also, the special effects were spot on for the series. The way warp speed, the experimental engine, the battle scenes, the sounds, and even space is incredibly well designed. It gave us an excellent look for the show and gave it a “realistic” look to the science fiction series.

One of the interesting aspects was Captain Lorca. In a reverse to Voyager, where Captain Janeway was a scientist commanding a mixed crew of Starfleet and rebels, Lorca’s crew consists of mostly scientists while he is a soldier. This change in dynamic brought on some tense moments that were very well acted by Isaacs and the other actors. It is sad, though, as his character is more interesting than the main character. In my opinion, the Captain will always be the most interesting person.

Over all, the political correctness, the pandering, shock value, and changes to the canon make the show more cringe. I tried to highlight the positive aspects, but it is difficult. If this is the direction of Star Trek, it is not a promising one.

Here is the trailer for season one:

What do you think? Let me know in the comments below. Tell me if there is a comic book, movie, or novel you would like me to review. While you are at it, check out my review of The Mule and my music review of Lady Antebellum’s What If I Never Get Over You. Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more posts like this one.

Did you know my new fantasy novel “The Seven Royals: All Good Things” is now available on Barnes and Noble and Amazon? You can get your e-book copy at BookLocker.

You can find me on everywhere on social media! Facebook: Author Jacob Airey | Instagram: realjacobairey| Twitter: @realJacobAirey | YouTube: StudioJake

9 comments

  1. I told people that season one wanted to be Star Trek: Game of Thrones, but it didn’t really do a great job with that. Star Trek isn’t about double-crosses, spies, or politics, anyway. Those elements can make great additions to a long-form story like everyone is doing now, but Star Trek has traditionally been about, well, discovery. Something the first season ironically lacked.

    Season two, though, is such a brilliant course correction and sets up a third season that could be even better. One almost wonders if this was their plan all along.

  2. From what little I’ve watched and the stuff from Red Letter Media, this is a very politically correct show. Some of the clips they showed characters were loudly extolling “SCIENCE!!” and “MATH!!”, which are the slogans of the pro AGW advocate and more women in STEM by any means necessary folks. The entire Star Trek franchise has been a cheerleader for multiculturalism which has been poison for American and european culture. If you can’t sense the “chalky undertaste” of what’s been fed through this show then you’re not a conservative movie reviewer – a rare bird I agree but something I seek out to avoid being suckered into being showed with message fiction and sucker punches. Take care, I’m de-bookmarking you.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.